New York prosecutors seek Sept. retrial for Weinstein
NEW YORK — Prosecutors asked for a September retrial for Harvey Weinstein during a hearing at a Manhattan courthouse Wednesday, the disgraced movie mogul’s first appearance since his 2020 rape conviction was overturned by an appeals court last week.
Weinstein, wearing a navy blue suit, was seated in a wheelchair pushed by a court officer as he entered the preliminary hearing.
Weinstein’s defense lawyer, Arthur Aidala, said his client was attending the hearing despite the 72-yearold having been hospitalized since shortly after his return to the city jail system Friday from an upstate prison. He has said Weinstein, who has cardiac issues and diabetes, was undergoing unspecified tests due to health issues.
Aidala said he has no concern about his client’s mental abilities, describing Weinstein as “sharp as a tack. As sharp as he ever was.”
Manhattan Dist. Atty. Alvin Bragg’s office has said it is determined to retry the case against Weinstein. Legal experts say that may be a long road and come down to whether the women he’s accused of assaulting are willing to testify again. One of the women, Mimi Haley, said Friday she was still considering whether she would testify at any retrial.
Prosecutors said another accuser, Jessica Mann, is prepared to testify again and suggested locking in a date after Labor Day for retrial.
Aidala said his client wants to prove his innocence: “It’s a new trial. It’s a new day.”
The once-powerful studio boss was also convicted in Los Angeles in 2022 of rape and is still sentenced to 16 years in prison in California.
In the New York case that was overturned, Weinstein was convicted of rape in the third degree on allegations of an attack on Mann in 2013 and of forcing himself on Haley in 2006. Weinstein had pleaded not guilty and maintained any sexual activity was consensual.
On Thursday, the New York Court of Appeals vacated Weinstein’s conviction, erasing his 23-year prison sentence, after concluding a judge permitted jurors to see and hear too much evidence not directly related to what he was charged with.